Immediate thoughts at the July 2024 UK general election result.
After 14 years of poisonous Tory rule I think we’re allowed to celebrate the result and look forward to a Labour govt that will not only face opposition from the right, but also from a much strengthened progressive side including 4 Green MPs. But: this result offers very little guarantee that the UK’s progressive turn will last longer than the current parliamentary term and progressives should worry about that from Day 1. Here’s my reasons for being more worried than excited today:
Labour’s reported ‘landslide’ victory isn’t backed up by significant gains in the vote share. The voting system is giving the party 64% of the seats based on 35% of the vote. The landslide is almost exclusively owed to the breakdown of votes for other parties. A shaky base for power.
My broad sense is that a proportion of those who voted for Labour didn’t do so out of excitement or enthusiasm, but because they disliked other parties more. It feels like this was actively embraced by Labour during the campaign, making themselves look ‘bland but competent’.
Perfect storm
Labour (and Lib Dems) benefited a lot from the vote split between Tories and Reform, which meant that for once there was little harm from the vote split on the progressive side – but that split also became more pronounced with Greens and independents winning more votes.
The ‘safe seat’ appears to be a rapidly evaporating phenomenon. The average size of majorities of elected MPs seems to have shrunk by quite a bit, while it looks like the average swing (the proportion of voters that has voted for a different party compared to the previous election) has increased a lot. This means that nearly every constituency will be a marginal seat next time.
All of this suggests to me that the reported size of Labour’s election win betrays the underlying reality of a volatile electorate that hasn’t voted for Labour en masse, and that may just as easily turn to different parties the next time around. This was a perfect storm, you won’t get it twice.
The UK isn’t immune to the populist and nationalist tendencies that are dominating politics elsewhere in Europe. The 2016 Referendum exposed this already, and the vote share for Reform UK in yesterday’s election is an ominous sign.
It’s looking plausible that the Conservatives will conclude that their way back to political relevance involves adopting the rhetoric of Reform UK, becoming a full-on anti-immigration party with little concern for climate or the rights of minorities.
What this will mean for the shape of the right-wing opposition is unclear. But progressives would be wise to prepare for the worst: that the Tories and Reform merge into a single populist force that presents itself as the only alternative to Starmer’s govt in 4-5 years’ time.
Fair votes now
That’s the time progressives have to turn this accident of the voting system into a project that inspires enough hope and confidence for people to get behind it. And the key to that may well be in restoring people’s sense of agency – that they can be part of change, however small at first.
Such an agenda will only work if it is underpinned by a serious effort to make the democratic system fair, transparent and effective. Indeed, that would mean getting electoral reform done. The election result adds to the case for that, even if Labour have been beneficiaries of first-past-the-post (FPTP) this time.
Introducing a proportional system now would not only help restore a sense of agency and trust among voters. It would also remove the risk that the next FPTP accident would see the extreme right getting a parliamentary majority on less than a third of the vote.
The irony is that today’s FPTP accident has given Labour the key to making electoral reform happen. There are many in the party who are in favour. Allies in other parties and organisations will work with them. The odds may be against them. Yet, the case for change can’t be resisted forever.

Leaders’ debate bingo (advanced)
Here are ten words that I predict will receive very few mentions in this evening’s leaders’ debate on ITV – the only scheduled televised confrontation in the run-up to the UK general elections on 7 May.
Not random words of course, but things that you might reasonably expect the parties represented to care and differ about. Things that voters ought to know in order to make up their mind.
I suggest using them for election debate bingo this evening. In some circles this has become a popular game: listing words or terms that participants are likely to use, and crossing them off as they are said. I thought we could make that game a little bit more interesting for this evening by suggesting ten words that, despite their political relevance, are likely to remain in the margins. Write them onto your bingo form and there will be suspense until the end of the debate – can one of them please mention…?
2. Drugs. Past governments have wilfully ignored evidence that the UK policy on drugs is ineffective.
3. Ukraine. Escalation of this conflict will have repercussions all over Europe and the UK cannot afford to remain a bystander.
4. TTIP. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership – this deal between the US and the EU would see corporations getting much greater power to get around national legislation.
5. Gender pay gap. The most prominent of a range of gender equality issues that have the UK trailing other European countries.
6. Mental health. The achilles heel of the NHS.
7. Palestine. The re-election of Netanyahu in Israel implies that the road to peace remains long, while the wounds of the latest Gaza war haven’t healed at all.
8. Cycling. Prevention is the easiest way to reduce the cost of the NHS and the public health benefits of cycling are uncontested.
9. Flooding. A constant risk to many areas of the UK with far-reaching economic (as well as human) consequences.
10. Airport expansion. The grotesque PR war between Heathrow and Gatwick distracts from greater strategic questions about the north-south divide and climate change.
Crossed them all? Tweet BINGO to @DialoguebyRemco to claim your prize.
Leave a comment
Posted in Blog, Commentary, Democracy, TV
Tagged 2015, airport, bingo, cycling, debate, drugs, elections, flooding, food, gender, mental health, Palestine, politics, TTIP, TV, UK, Ukraine